Copyright (c) 2013 John L. Jerz

Value Systems and Social Process (Vickers, 1968, 1970)
Home
A Proposed Heuristic for a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Problem Solving and the Gathering of Diagnostic Information (John L. Jerz)
A Concept of Strategy (John L. Jerz)
Books/Articles I am Reading
Quotes from References of Interest
Satire/ Play
Viva La Vida
Quotes on Thinking
Quotes on Planning
Quotes on Strategy
Quotes Concerning Problem Solving
Computer Chess
Chess Analysis
Early Computers/ New Computers
Problem Solving/ Creativity
Game Theory
Favorite Links
About Me
Additional Notes
The Case for Using Probabilistic Knowledge in a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Resilience in Man and Machine

VickersVSASP.jpg

Sir Geoffrey Vickers was born in 1894 and educated at Oundle School and Merton College, Oxford. During the First World War he served with the Sherwood Foresters and other regiments, and in 1915 he won the V.C. [Victoria Cross, a medal of honor]
 After the war be became a solicitor and spent the next twenty years of his professional life mainly as a partner in a large law firm of corporation lawyers in the City of London. In the Second World War he was re-commissioned and embarked on a new career in administration, as Head of Economic Intelligence at the Ministry of Economic Warfare and as a member of the Joint Intelligence Committee of the Chiefs of Staff. In 1945 he was knighted. He then joined the National Coal Board, first as legal adviser and later as the member responsible for manpower, training, education, health and welfare.
 Since his retirement in 1955, Sir Geoffrey has combined his writing and lecturing activities with part-time directorships. He has been a member of many public and professional bodies, including the Medical Research Council, the London Passenger Transport Board, and the Councils of the Law Society and the Royal Institute of International Affairs. He has been much concerned with social aspects of medicine, psychiatry and mental health, and from 1952 to 1967 he was Chairman of the Research Committee of the Mental Health Research Fund.
 Sir Geoffrey is a frequent contributor to learned journals and is the author of the following books: The Undirected Society (1959), The Art of Judgment (1965), Towards a Sociology of Management (1967) and Freedom in a Rocking Boat (1970).
 
JLJ - Vickers wrestles with the essence of cognition, how we as humans do what we do. More than that, he is concerned with the actual steps we take to go about our business, managing relationships, satisfying needs, and gathering the information we need to accomplish this.

p.56 In any field in which men function, the relevant facts and forces include not only what is happening but also what men think is going to happen... The inner world is fundamentally strucured by human values. 
  It is thus a dynamic structure, a configuration of forces; and it behaves like other dynamic systems.
 
p.100 The situation to which the policy-maker attends is not a datum but a construct, a mental artifact, a collective work of art. It has to be simplified, or it becomes unmanageable; yet if it is over-simplified, it will be no guide to action. It has to reflect present and future reality
 
p.101 The object of these procedures is, first, to ensure that action serves policy; secondly, to improve the information on which to choose
 
p.103 Even a chess-playing computer, I understand, when involved in the complexities of the middle game, cannot guide its play by a strict analysis of costs and benefits but has to rely on general principles.
 
p.104 The solution to any multi-valued choice is a work of art combining in a unique way the regulation of the various relations involved... he cannot tell in advance what combination will prove attainable or even preferable.
 
p.127 Wildly disparate aims... fight for realization, each an expression of the urge to bring some relation up to standard. No built-in hierarchy or order of priorities decides how far each shall have its way. The choice is multi-valued.
 
p.128 the recognition of policy-making as the regulation of relations stresses that the standards by which these relations are judged are not goals to be attained once and for all but, like the mariner's course, must be constantly be sought anew. I will call them norms.
 
p.134 We notice only those aspects of reality that 'interest' us... Interest is the basic fact of mental life - and the most elementary act of valuation... Predators soon learn to notice whatever is relevant to catching their prey... All the psycho-social sciences... have shown that mental life and hence personal and social regulation are based on the development of schemata for classifying experience... The multi-valued choice always involves different ways of seeing the same situation, ways to which different values are attached.
 
p.142 It is very odd that we have no name for these states of readiness to discriminate and to evaluate which are both the product and the condition of human communication - unless, indeed, their name is 'mind'... I call it an appreciative system, because these readinesses are organized systematically and enable us... to discriminate and to value... This nameless faculty is fundamental to many human problems. [JLJ - such as programming a machine to 'play' a game. The fundamental problem in computer chess is creating a perception (and from this, an orientation) that can be used as an effective guide to action. 50 years from now, this will still likely be the fundamental problem in computer chess. ]
 
p.161 the objects of our attention include relations extended in time. This we should expect; for organisms and organizations are relations extended in time. Their continuity depends on keeping the more essential of these relationships within critical limits.
 
p.162 A man who wants to become Prime Minister may and probably does seek the satisfaction of being appointed to that office and he may properly regard the attainment of this as a goal; but it is to be hoped that he also looks forward to supporting the complex relations which attach to the role and which must be sustained as long as it is held.
 
p.162 I stress the importance of ongoing relations as objects of attention because they seem to be unduly ignored... we do not seek or shun objects but relations with objects. No one wants an apple; he wants to eat it, sell it, paint it, perhaps just to admire it, in any case to relate to it in some way or another.
 
p.164 Appreciative behaviour involves making judgements of value... It is convenient first to separate judgments of 'importance-unimportance' from other kinds of value judgement... I will describe judgements of importance-unimportance as judgements of interest. Interest is the selector. It must precede reality judgement, even though other kinds of value judgement may follow later.
 
p.164 Men maintain expectations of the future course of their manifold relations and constantly scan the unfolding present for confirmation or disproof.
 
p.172-173 But soon communication engineers, devising controls for spacecraft and automatic factories, were having to design their own senders and receivers in a communication network and to furnish them with programmes, determining what they should notice, how they should evaluate it, and what they should do about it. They had thus distinguished the three main functions of any regulator, including the human mind in its regulative capacity; and they had become directly involved in problems of meaning.
 
p.174-175 So the subject-matter of science is a hierarchy of systems... the object of attention is a dynamic system, a configuration of forces... organic forms rely on information to regulate their internal relations... they develop means of using information to regulate their external relations also.
 
p.178 The simplest decision on action - 'In these circumstances this should be done' - is the selection of a response from a repertory by rules which determine what is suitable to what occasion. The categories by which we discriminate, the standards by which we value, the repertory of responses from which we select, and our rules for selection are all mental artifacts, evolved, learned, and taught by the cultural process
 
p.179 It is the comparison of actual with norm which generates in thermostat or automatic pilot the signal which evokes the regulative response. However complex be the process which constructs its representation of the actual and selects the strategy of regulation, neither is either possible or meaningful except in relation to the norm, the setting which the system is trying to maintain.
 
p.180 one should never lose sight of the fact that information is an incomplete concept. Whether it informs and, if so, what meaning it conveys, depends on the organization of the participants in the network in which it is used; and this organization is in turn developed by participation in the network.
 
p.193-195 This circular process of 'education' is seen at its simplest and best attested in the growth of perception... Perfect vision conveys no message to the mind, until experience has built up schemata to order the 'blooming, buzzing confusion' [JLJ - uncited reference to William James, The Principles of Psychology Vol.1, 1890, p.488]... These schemata are 'readiness to see' things in one way, rather than another; habits of selecting and grouping for attention, which develop cognition out of recognition. Facilitating the seeing of things one way, they impede the subsequent seeing of them in another way... Not only perception but all cognition depends on recognition by the use of schemata... Whatever the mind can represent to itself, from a cow to a contract, from a law of nature to a legal principle, is recognized by applying schemata - 'readiness to see' which are themselves developed... by their further use... This circular process... is ubiquitous through the whole range of human learning. It is the commonest fact of life... An outstanding characteristic of the circular process is its capacity for admitting change without losing continuity... the schemata by which our conceptual world is organized... serve effectively as an interpreter of experience, a basis for communication, and a guide to action.
 
p.197 What selects these, rather than other aspects of reality for our attention? What kinds of attention are bestowed on them? They are selected because they are relevant to the needs of the creatures that select them, and the kinds of attention bestowed on them are as various as the needs; but these 'needs' have become immensely varied by the same process as has generated so complex a reality system.
 
p.198-199 Only by comparing the two - comparing 'what is' with 'what ought to be' - can it [an automatic pilot] derive a signal to select an appropriate rudder movement. It cannot make the 'appreciation' which leads to selective action, unless it has both the relevant information and the standard which gives the information meaning for it. It would be absurd to suppose that the human mind, which, whatever else it does, clearly functions as a regulator, would or could select facts without values to make them relevant.
 
p.205 This view of scientific method assumes that all scientific activity starts with a problem.
 
p.213 Each of us is bombarded by potential information from all manner of sources, from which we accept only what the current set of our attention and the current setting of our appreciative system allows us to notice and interpret.

Enter supporting content here