Copyright (c) 2013 John L. Jerz

Influence as a Measure of Success (Knight, 2011)

Home
A Proposed Heuristic for a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Problem Solving and the Gathering of Diagnostic Information (John L. Jerz)
A Concept of Strategy (John L. Jerz)
Books/Articles I am Reading
Quotes from References of Interest
Satire/ Play
Viva La Vida
Quotes on Thinking
Quotes on Planning
Quotes on Strategy
Quotes Concerning Problem Solving
Computer Chess
Chess Analysis
Early Computers/ New Computers
Problem Solving/ Creativity
Game Theory
Favorite Links
About Me
Additional Notes
The Case for Using Probabilistic Knowledge in a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Resilience in Man and Machine

 
Military Review, January-February 2011, p.64-72

Major Andrew J. Knight is the Field Artillery branch representative at West Point, New York. He received a B.S. from West Point and is currently pursuing an MPA from John Jay College. He is a graduate of the Field Artillery Officer Basic Course and Career Course. He was the logistics officer for the 17th Fires Brigade while in Iraq. During two tours in Afghanistan, he served as the effects coordinator for 1-32 Infantry Battalion Task Force; commander of C Company, 1-32 Infantry; and the brigade fire support officer for 3rd Brigade, 10th Mountain Division.

[JLJ - note to self, put in current paper]

p.64 The true measure of success in Afghanistan, and one that is not uniformly evaluated, is the amount of “influence” that the government holds over the population.
  My definition of influence in Afghanistan is the capacity or power of persons or entities to be a compelling force on the actions, behavior, beliefs, and opinions of the population.
 
p.65 Lack of an objective influence-measurement tool hampers our ability to recognize whether our actions and the actions of the Afghan government are having a positive or negative effect. If we are going to be successful in Afghanistan, we must be able to quickly and accurately determine where and when we need to reinforce success or revamp our strategy. Therefore, we need an objective method to identify influence over the population, measure it, and recognize methods for increasing influence
 
p.67 The Tactical Conflict Assessment and Planning Framework is supposed to create data that immediately focuses efforts toward developing effective programs to create stability.
 
p.67 A system for measuring influence derived from data collected by patrols and population surveys would provide the ability to evaluate influence throughout the entire country.
 
p.71 To make an influence analysis system that produces accurate information, one must use a basic approach that does not overburden the data collectors.
 
p.72 influence must be uniformly measured to depict progress.
 
p.72 The proper metric for understanding success at the tactical level is the influence that the GIRoA [Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan] and ISAF [International Security Assistance Force] have over the population.
 
p.72 Greater control... would benefit the counterinsurgency... holding influence over the informal power structure can achieve the same effect.
 
p.72 Objectively measuring influence to depict progress accurately is vital
 
p.72 The proposed metrics for friendly and enemy influence above may not be the best, but that does not decrease the importance of establishing influence
 
p.72 Increasing friendly influence while reducing [opponent] influence is progress toward improving stability... an unavoidable requirement for successful accomplishment of the... mission [JLJ - or perhaps winning a board game]

Enter supporting content here