Copyright (c) 2013 John L. Jerz

Integrated Planning (Grigsby, Gorman, Marr, McLamb, Stewart, Schifferle, 2011)
Home
A Proposed Heuristic for a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Problem Solving and the Gathering of Diagnostic Information (John L. Jerz)
A Concept of Strategy (John L. Jerz)
Books/Articles I am Reading
Quotes from References of Interest
Satire/ Play
Viva La Vida
Quotes on Thinking
Quotes on Planning
Quotes on Strategy
Quotes Concerning Problem Solving
Computer Chess
Chess Analysis
Early Computers/ New Computers
Problem Solving/ Creativity
Game Theory
Favorite Links
About Me
Additional Notes
The Case for Using Probabilistic Knowledge in a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Resilience in Man and Machine

The Operations Process, Design, and the Military Decision making Process
 
 
Military Review, January-February 2011, p.28-35

Colonel Wayne W. Grigsby, Jr., is the director of the School of Advanced Military Studies at Fort Leavenworth, KS. All contributing authors are faculty members at the school.

p.28 effective planning has both a conceptual and a detailed component.
 
p.29 design is a tool for conceptual thinking, and effective solutions require both a conceptual component and a detailed component.
 
p.29 Any problem that involves predicting the behavior of human beings is inherently complex.
 
p.30 We plan, almost exclusively, in an environment of uncertainty.
 
p.30 There simply is no substitute for clear and concise thinking
 
p.30 When Army officers reflected on their First World War experiences in Infantry in Battle, they concluded that the most essential element in the “practice of the art of war” is the ability to “cut to the heart of a situation, recognize its decisive elements, and base . . . [a] course of action on these.” The ability to do this, they concluded, requires “training in solving problems of all types, long practice in making clear, unequivocal decisions, the habit of concentrating on the question at hand, and an elasticity of mind.”
 
p.31 It [the design methodology] allows them [commanders and their staff] to better understand the complexity of the problem by becoming familiar with the critical elements in the environment and then approximating the problem to a level of simplicity that allows for meaningful action... The design methodology does not produce an executable solution, however. Its role is to assist the commander in “getting his arms around” a new and unfamiliar problem or an old problem that has changed in some new and unexpected way. Having achieved that, the design methodology must be integrated with a more detailed approach to planning
 
p.31 effective planning requires both conceptual and detailed thinking. All effective planning requires a conceptual component, and many of the ideas underlying the design methodology (such as reflection, iteration, systems thinking, learning theory, narrative, cultural lenses, and more) are useful to the commander and staff even when there is insufficient time to explicitly employ the design methodology as described in FM 5-0. An effective planner will find himself using these tools even when faced with problems that are relatively familiar to him because they allow him to move quickly to the more detailed planning that is necessary for action.
 
p.34 planners must be able to master conceptual thinking and detailed thinking, with the design methodology serving as one of several available tools. The ability of a commander or a planner to recognize the decisive elements of a problem and develop a course of action based on these rests on his ability to think in both conceptual terms and in detail.

Enter supporting content here