Copyright (c) 2012 John L. Jerz

Design for a Brain (Ashby, 1952, 1954)
Home
A Proposed Heuristic for a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Problem Solving and the Gathering of Diagnostic Information (John L. Jerz)
A Concept of Strategy (John L. Jerz)
Books/Articles I am Reading
Quotes from References of Interest
Satire/ Play
Viva La Vida
Quotes on Thinking
Quotes on Planning
Quotes on Strategy
Quotes Concerning Problem Solving
Computer Chess
Chess Analysis
Early Computers/ New Computers
Problem Solving/ Creativity
Game Theory
Favorite Links
About Me
Additional Notes
The Case for Using Probabilistic Knowledge in a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Resilience in Man and Machine

 
Ashby uses the word "ultrastability" where the word "resilience" might be used today.

v The book is not a treatise on all cerebral mechanisms but an attempt to solve a specific problem: the origin of the nervous system's unique ability to produce adaptive behaviour.
 
p.35 Given an organism, its environment is defined as those variables whose changes affect the organism, and those variables which are changed by the organism's behaviour. It is thus defined in a purely functional, not a material, sense.
 
p.36 The organism affects the environment, and the environment affects the organism: such a system is said to have 'feedback'
 
p.37 'In most cases the change which induces a reaction is brought about by the organism's own movements. These cause a change in the relation of the organism to the environment: to these changes the organism reacts. The whole behaviour of free-moving organisms is based on the principle that it is the movements of the organism that have brought about stimulation.' (Jennings.)
 
p.57  I propose the definition that a form of behaviour is adaptive if it maintains the essential variables within physiological limits.
 
p.63 The thesis that 'adaptation' means the maintenance of essential variables within psychological limits is thus seen to hold not only over the simpler activities of primitive animals but over the more complex activities of the 'higher' organisms.
 
p.64 We can now recognise that 'adaptive' behaviour is equivalent to the behaviour of a stable system, the region of the stability being the region of the phase-space in which all the essential variables lie within their normal limits.
 
p.103 I propose, therefore, the thesis that the living organism uses the principle of ultrastability as an automatic means of ensuring the adaptiveness of its learned behaviour.
 
p.106 Jennings grasped the fundamental fact that aimless change can lead to adaptation provided that some active process rejects the bad and retains the good.
 
p.110 In the previous sections a few simple examples have suggested that the adaptation of the living organism may be due to ultrastability. But the argument has not excluded the possibility that other theories might fit the facts equally well. I shall now give, therefore, evidence to show that ultrastability is not merely plausible but necessary: the organism must be ultrastable.
 
p.112 In order to be definite about what 'trial and error' implies, here is the concept defined explicitly:
(1) The organism makes trials only when 'dissatisfied ' or 'irritated' in some way.
(2) Each trial persists for a finite time.
(3) While the irritation continues, the succession of trials continues.
(4) The succeeding trial is not specially related to the preceding, nor better than it, but only different.
(5) The process stops at the first trial that relieves the irritation.
 
p.130  it will be found that some of the ultrastable system's failures in adaptation occur in situations that are well known to be just those in which living organisms also are apt to fail.
(1) If an ultrastable system's critical surfaces are not disposed in proper relation to the limits of the essential variables (S. 9/1), the system may seek an inappropriate goal or may fail to take corrective action when the essential variables are dangerously near their limits.
 
p.131 (2) Even if the ultrastable system is suitably arranged - if the critical states are encountered before the essential variables reach their extreme limits - it usually cannot adapt to an environment that behaves with sudden discontinuities.
 
p.132 (4) If we grade an ultrastable system's environments according to the difficulty they present, we shall find that at the 'easy' end are those that consist of a few variables, independent of each other, and that at the 'difficult' end are those that contain many variables richly cross-linked to form a complex whole.
 
p.137-138 The learner-driver of a motor-car, for instance, who can only just keep the car in the centre of the road, may find that any attempt at changing gear results in the car, apparently, trying to mount the pavement. Later, when he is more skilled, the act of changing gear will have no effect on the direction of the car's travel. Adaptation thus demands not only the integration of related activities but the independence of unrelated activities. [JLJ - we have people using cell phones today who cannot both talk and drive.]
 
p.184 This is what may happen; but will it actually occur? The tendency to adaptation may be persistent, but why should the process take the favourable course? First we notice that as adaptation in some form or other is inevitable the only question is what form it will take.
 
p.240 Ashby, W. Ross. The physical origin of adaptation by trial and error. Journal of general Psychology, 32, 13 ; 1945.
 

Enter supporting content here