Copyright (c) 2013 John L. Jerz

A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness (Baars, 1988)
Home
A Proposed Heuristic for a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Problem Solving and the Gathering of Diagnostic Information (John L. Jerz)
A Concept of Strategy (John L. Jerz)
Books/Articles I am Reading
Quotes from References of Interest
Satire/ Play
Viva La Vida
Quotes on Thinking
Quotes on Planning
Quotes on Strategy
Quotes Concerning Problem Solving
Computer Chess
Chess Analysis
Early Computers/ New Computers
Problem Solving/ Creativity
Game Theory
Favorite Links
About Me
Additional Notes
The Case for Using Probabilistic Knowledge in a Computer Chess Program (John L. Jerz)
Resilience in Man and Machine

BaarsCognitiveTheoryofC.jpg

By contrasting well-established conscious phenomena with closely comparable unconscious ones, this study suggests a way to specify empirical constraints on a theory of consciousness.
 
'A clear-eyed, open-minded analysis of the problems of consciousness, and a wide-ranging synthesis of a variety of approaches. For those who want to join the race to model consciousness, this is the starting line.' Daniel C. Dennett

'With this model, the author sweeps through dozens of phenomena that are well known to students of sensation, perception, learning abstraction, language, thinking, and problem solving. In each case he interprets the model in terms of the global model workplace and thus produces an admirable piece of scholarship. The most enduring contribution of the book may be its challenge to cognitive scientists to return to their roots, to describe and explain consciousness. Without a decent theory of consciousness, cognitive science may be adrift. If that is so, then (this work) deserves to be read by many.' Contemporary Psychology

'The book includes 'numerous whimsical experiments ... in order to demonstrate points best appreciated experimentally. Anyone with a playful nature will find these illustrations captivating.' Contemporary Psychiatry

'The powerful core of Baars' model of consciousness is the global workspace, a kind of central bulletin board. It allows scores of specialized mental subsystems (expert but narrow) to contribute to the resolution of novel problems. Baars is careful and thoughtful, and shows constant concern for the testability of his ideas.' Dr. David Galin, Langley Porter Psychiatry Institute, University of California, San Francisco
 
[JLJ - A heroic foundational attempt at explaining consciousness. Synthesizing ideas from many authors, there is no better place to start your own understanding of one of life's remaining mysteries.]

p.5 Conscious experience is hard to study because we cannot easily stand outside of it, to observe the effects of its presence and absence.
 
p.5 The difficulty in studying unconscious processes is even more obvious - by definition, we cannot directly observe them at all. Unconscious processes can only be inferred, based on our own experience and on observation of others.
 
p.20 There is evidence suggesting that "unattended" streams of information are processed and represented even though they are not conscious
 
p.20-21 There is evidence that perceptual events are processed for some time before they become conscious, so that there are apparently unconscious input representations
 
p.21 there are many contextual representations and processes that shape a perceptual interpretation, but which are not themselves conscious
 
p.39 Two more current ideas deserve discussion before we can go on. They are, first, the idea that the function of consciousness is to "glue" together separable perceptual features (Treisman & Gelade, 1980) and second, that consciousness or attention creates access to information-processing resources in the nervous system (Navon & Gopher, 1979). If we combine these ideas with the previous conceptions of attention and immediate memory, we come very close to the theoretical approach advanced in this book.
 
p.41 The idea that attention or consciousness involves access to processing resources is very powerful, and is a major aspect of the theory advanced in this book. Notice that most of the processing resources in the nervous system are unconscious, so that we have the remarkable situation of conscious events being used to gain access to unconscious processing resources.
 
p.43 Unconscious events are treated in this book as the functioning of specialized systems. The roots of this view can be found in the everyday observation that as we gain some skill or knowledge, it tends to becomes less and less conscious in its details. Our most proficient skills are generally the least conscious. We will first explore the properties of unconscious representations; then see how representations are involved in unconscious information processing; this in turn leads to the notion of specialized unconscious processors.
 
p.45 Human knowledge can be naturally viewed as a way of representing the world and ourselves... We can think of knowledge, percepts, images, plans, intentions, and memories as representations.
 
p.46 The Orienting Response (OR) is a set of physiological changes that take place when an animal detects a new event. Any animal will orient its eyes, ears, and nose toward the new event
 
p.55 Clear evidence has emerged in recent decades for "feature detectors" in perception.
 
p.61 All these sources of evidence suggest there are indeed many intelligent, unconscious processors in the nervous system.
 
p.61 In this book we cannot do justice to even one kind of unconscious specialist, and we will not try. Rather, we treat specialists here as the "bricks" for building an architecture of the nervous system, concentrating on the role of conscious experience in this architecture. Of course, we must specify in general what these bricks are like.
 
p.73 Almost everything we do, we do better unconsciously than consciously.... we are unconscious of the complexity of whatever we know already... Any task improves with practice, and as it becomes more efficient it also becomes less consciously available. Thus anything we do well, we do largely unconsciously. But then what advantage is there to being conscious at all?
 
p.135 Repeated events tend to fade from consciousness, yet they continue to be processed unconsciously.  To be conscious an event must be novel or significant; it must apparently trigger widespread adaptive processing in the nervous system.
 
p.203 Conceptual and goal processes can similarly be viewed as sensitive to information - to distinctions that make a difference, that trigger adaptive processes.
 
p.307 automatic attention must surely work as well... the spontaneous flow of thought is highly sensitive to current personal significance... Automatic attention is guided by goals

Enter supporting content here